The Assignment
Part 1: Key Project Elements

Complete your paper of 6–8 pages, plus cover page and references page, explaining your investigation of three hypothetical practice sites for an EBP QI project.

Part 2: Implementation Science Presentation

Complete your PowerPoint presentation of 3–5 slides, plus cover and reference slides, to inform hypothetical stakeholders.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
RUBRIC:

The Assignment:
Part 1: Key Project Elements

In a paper of 6–8 pages, plus cover page and references page, include the following:

• Describe the three health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project. For each health care setting, identify the following defining features: patient population, mission, public or private entity, single institution or member of a corporation, and others you identify as significant.
Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed description of three health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project, with a clear, accurate, and detailed identification of all defining features and others you identify as significant.
Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate description of three health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project, with clear and accurate identification of all defining features; there may not be others identified as significant.
Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate description of three health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project, with vague and/or inaccurate identification of defining features and no others identified as significant.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate description of three or fewer health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project, with vague and inaccurate or missing identification of defining features and no others identified as significant.
• Compare the settings for strengths and weaknesses as sites for an EBP QI project. Be specific and provide examples.
Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed comparison of the settings for strengths and weaknesses as sites for an EBP QI project.

The response fully synthesizes and integrates at least three scholarly resources that fully support the comparison provided.
Points Range:12 (6.00%) – 13 (6.50%)
The response provides a clear and accurate comparison of the settings for strengths and weaknesses as sites for an EBP QI project.

The response synthesizes and integrates at least two scholarly resources that support the comparison provided.
Points Range:11 (5.50%) – 11 (5.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate comparison of the settings for strengths and weaknesses as sites for an EBP QI project.

The response somewhat synthesizes and integrates two scholarly resources that may support the comparison provided.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or missing comparison of the settings for strengths and weaknesses as sites for an EBP QI project.

The response minimally and/or inaccurately synthesizes and integrates one or two scholarly resources or is missing resources.
• Explain the practice problems that you explored based on your interests and identified needs of the health care settings you investigated.
Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed explanation of the practice problems that you explored based on your interests, and identified needs of the health care settings you investigated.
Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the practice problems that you explored based on your interests, and identified needs of the health care settings you investigated.
Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate explanation of the practice problems that you explored based on your interests, and identified needs of the health care settings you investigated.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%)
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or missing explanation of the practice problems that you explored based on your interests, and identified needs of the health care settings you investigated.
• Explain why each problem is a potential focus for an EBP QI project. Be specific and provide examples.
Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed explanation of why each problem is a potential focus for an EBP QI project.

The response fully synthesizes and integrates at least three scholarly resources that fully support the explanation provided.
Points Range:12 (6.00%) – 13 (6.50%)
The response provides a clear and accurate explanation of why each problem is a potential focus for an EBP QI project.

The response synthesizes and integrates at least two scholarly resources that support the explanation provided.
Points Range:11 (5.50%) – 11 (5.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate explanation of why each problem is a potential focus for an EBP QI project.

The response somewhat synthesizes and integrates two scholarly resources that may support the explanation provided.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or missing explanation of why each problem is a potential focus for an EBP QI project.

The response minimally and/or inaccurately synthesizes and integrates one or two scholarly resources or is missing resources.
• For each health care setting, describe the stakeholders whose approval would be required to initiate an EBP QI project and implement the results.
Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed description of the stakeholders whose approval would be required to initiate an EBP QI project and implement the results.
Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate description of the stakeholders whose approval would be required to initiate an EBP QI project and implement the results.
Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate description of the stakeholders whose approval would be required to initiate an EBP QI project and implement the results.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate and/or missing descriptions of the stakeholders whose approval would be required to initiate an EBP QI project and implement the results.
• Compare similarities and differences in stakeholder requirements across the settings.
Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed comparison of similarities and differences in stakeholder requirements across the settings.
Points Range:12 (6.00%) – 13 (6.50%)
The response provides a clear and accurate comparison of similarities and differences in stakeholder requirements across the settings.
Points Range:11 (5.50%) – 11 (5.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate comparison of similarities and differences in stakeholder requirements across the settings.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate, or missing, comparison of similarities and differences in stakeholder requirements across the settings.
• Identify the one proposed health care setting/practice site and one proposed practice problem you have selected as the focus of a hypothetical presentation to stakeholders, and explain your choices.
Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed identification of one proposed health care setting/practice site and one proposed practice problem as the focus of a hypothetical presentation to stakeholders; and a clear, accurate, and detailed explanation of those choices.
Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate identification of one proposed health care setting/practice site and one proposed practice problem as the focus of a hypothetical presentation to stakeholders; and a clear and accurate explanation of those choices.
Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%)
The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate identification of one proposed health care setting/practice site and one proposed practice problem as the focus of a hypothetical presentation to stakeholders; and a vague and/or inaccurate explanation of one or both choices.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate, and/or missing identification of one proposed health care setting/practice site and/or one proposed practice problem as the focus of a hypothetical presentation to stakeholders; and a vague and inaccurate and/or missing explanation of one or both choices.
The Assignment:
Part 2: Implementation Science Presentation

In a PowerPoint presentation of 3–5 slides, plus cover and references slides, include the following:

• Introduce the framework or model you have selected for the EBP QI project and your reasoning.
(1–2 slides)
Points Range:45 (22.50%) – 50 (25.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed introduction of the framework or model you selected for the EBP QI project and clear, accurate, and detailed reasoning.
Points Range:40 (20.00%) – 44 (22.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate introduction of the framework or model you selected for the EBP QI project and clear and accurate reasoning.
Points Range:35 (17.50%) – 39 (19.50%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate introduction of the framework or model you selected for the EBP QI project and vague or inaccurate reasoning.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 34 (17.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate or missing introduction of the framework or model you selected for the EBP QI project and vague, inaccurate, or missing reasoning.
• Present a draft of the proposed practice problem. Include notes for each slide describing points you would make to the assembled stakeholders to obtain their approval or buy-in for the EBP QI project.
(2–3 slides)
Points Range:45 (22.50%) – 50 (25.00%)
The response provides a clear, accurate, and detailed presentation of a draft of the proposed practice problem, including clear, accurate, and detailed notes for each slide describing points to make to the assembled stakeholders to obtain their approval or buy-in for the EBP QI project.
Points Range:40 (20.00%) – 44 (22.00%)
The response provides a clear and accurate presentation of a draft of the proposed practice problem, including mostly clear and accurate notes for each slide describing points to make to the assembled stakeholders to obtain their approval or buy-in for the EBP QI project.
Points Range:35 (17.50%) – 39 (19.50%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate presentation of a draft of the proposed practice problem, including some vague or inaccurate notes for each slide describing points to make to the assembled stakeholders to obtain their approval or buy-in for the EBP QI project.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 34 (17.00%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate presentation of a draft of the proposed practice problem, with vague and inaccurate and/or mostly or completely missing notes for each slide describing points to make to the assembled stakeholders to obtain their approval or buy-in for the EBP QI project.
Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph/
Sentence Structure
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points Range:5 (2.50%) – 5 (2.50%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity, and clarity.
Points Range:4 (2.00%) – 4 (2.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Points Range:3 (1.50%) – 3 (1.50%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 2 (1.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting: English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 5 (2.50%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 4 (2.00%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range:3.5 (1.75%) - 3.5 (1.75%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3 (1.50%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Written Expression and Formatting: The assignment contains parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least three evidence-based references are listed. Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 5 (2.50%) Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least three evidence-based references are listed. Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 4 (2.00%) Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least two evidence-based references are listed. Points Range:3.5 (1.75%) - 3.5 (1.75%) Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least one evidence-based references are listed. Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3 (1.50%) Contains one or no parenthetical/in-text citations and no evidence-based references are listed.


 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper

For order inquiries     +1 (518) 291 4128

Open chat
You can now contact our live agent via Whatsapp! via +1 518 291-4128

You will get plagiarism free custom written paper ready for submission to your Blackboard.