Apply principles of nursing theory to the public health system by analyzing determinants of health and the public health intervention wheel.
Intervention and Evaluation
The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to provide an opportunity to develop a community health nursing intervention and evaluation tool for your identified community health problem (described in Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis) and identify the components of the nursing process as they apply to a community or population.
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO1: Apply principles of nursing theory to the public health system by analyzing determinants of health and the public health intervention wheel. (PO 1)
CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8)
CO4: Evaluate the delivery of care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities based on theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1)
Submit your assignment to the appropriate basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 6.
Points: 250 points
You are a community public health nurse (C/PHN) working in your setting of choice. You have analyzed the data collected from your windshield survey and assessment and diagnosis assignments (the first two milestones) and identified one community health nursing problem. You have decided on one nursing intervention and need your organization’s approval for funding of this intervention. Your leadership team has agreed to listen to your proposal.
- Watch the Milestone 3 tutorial by clicking this link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 6 Assignments page.
- Choose a community health nurse setting. Some examples of settings are school nurse, parish nurse, home health nurse, nurse working in the health department (be specific to what area in the health department, e.g., WIC, STD clinic, health promotion, maternal-child health, etc.)
- Introduction: Introduce the identified problem, the purpose of the presentation, and reiterate at least one or two important findings that demonstrate this problem in your community (average of 1–2 slides)
- Proposed Intervention: Propose one community health nursing intervention that would address one or more of the major factors that contribute to the problem (average of 3–4 slides).
- Describe your specific nursing intervention relating it to the public health intervention wheel (Nies & McEwen, 2015, p. 14, Figure 1-3)
- Who is your target population?
- Where is this intervention taking place?
- Will it take place one time or multiple times?
- How will you reach out to your target population?
- How will you get your target population involved?
- What is the CH nurse’s role in this intervention?
- Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physician’s office, church, local resources, etc.)
- Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)?
- If yes, are they paid or volunteers?
- What level(s) of prevention is your intervention addressing (primary, secondary, or tertiary prevention)?
- Intervention Justification: Justify why the problem and your nursing intervention should be a priority.
- Based on what you have found in the scholarly literature, discuss why these interventions are expected to be effective.
- Include summarized information from at least two professional scholarly sources from peer reviewed journals related to your intervention (average of 2–3 slides).
- Proposed Evaluation Methods: Your presentation must include at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method that you would use to determine whether your intervention is effective. Outcome measurement is a crucial piece when implementing interventions (average of 2–3 slides)
- Describe at least one quantitative or qualitative method you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective. (There is a helpful tool found in Doc Sharing to assist you with understanding qualitative and quantitative methods of evaluation).
- Describe the desired outcomes you would track that would show whether your intervention was working.
- Include a discussion about the long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is successful.
- Summary: The summary should reiterate the main points of the presentation and conclude with what you are asking to be accomplished; for example, “Based on ABC, it is imperative our community has XYZ. Thank you for your consideration.”
- In addition to the slides described above, your presentation should include a title slide with your name included and a reference slide. Remember, you are presenting to your leadership team, so the slides should include the most important elements for them to know in short bullet pointed phrases. You may add additional comments in the notes section to clarify information for your instructor.
- Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 (or later).
- Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be no more than 20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide).
- Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: Milestone 3 Intervention and Evaluation by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6.
- Save the assignment with your last name in the file title: example: “Smith Intervention and Evaluation.”
- Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions.
- Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started.
Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
- Be creative but realistic with your intervention and evaluation tool.
- Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
- Slides should be easy to read with short bullet points and large font.
- Review directions thoroughly.
- Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the reference page.
- Proofread prior to final submission.
- Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
- Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy.
Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Intervention and Evaluation (250 points)
|Criteria||A(92–100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance||B(84–91%)Very good or high level of performance||C(76–83%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance||F(0–75%)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance||Pts|
|Problem identification20 points||Presentation includes at least one slide that introduces the problem and significant findings in the community.(18–20 points)||Problem is introduced but lacks support with findings.(17 points)||Supportive findings discussed but problem identification not clear.(16 points)||Problem is not introduced and does not include community findings.(0–15 points)||/20|
|Proposed intervention85 points||One community health nursing intervention is proposed that would address one or more of the major direct or indirect factors that contribute to the problem. Intervention includes specifics:*Intervention described and related to Public Health Intervention Wheel*Community setting outlined.
*Intervention location described.
*Timing of intervention (length and number of sessions) included.
*Outreach and engagement methods described.
*CHN role in intervention outlined.
*Collaborating with other disciplines or community leaders discussed (e.g., physician’s office, church, local resources).
*Level(s) of prevention addressed (primary, secondary, and/or tertiary).
|One intervention is proposed but is missing one or two specific details from column one.(71–77 points)||Intervention is missing more than two specific details from column one.(65–70 points)||Intervention is not proposed or does not address any details in column one.(0–64 points)||/85|
|Intervention justification and application of evidence-based literature30 points||Includes at least one slide that discusses why this intervention should be a priority based on two scholarly findings. Two or more quality references from peer reviewed articles and their findings are summarized to show that the evidence supports your intervention.(28–30 points)||Includes slide stating why the intervention should be a priority. Two references cited but references may be not be a scholarly article or is not directly relevant to your rationale.(25–27 points)||Intervention justification inadequate or fewer than two scholarly references cited.(23–24 points)||Lacks slide on intervention justification. No references cited.(0–22 points)||/30|
|Evaluation70 points||Presentation includes at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method and desired outcomes. Long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is “successful” discussed.(64–70 points)||At least one evaluation method adequately described but lacks discussion on long- and short-term impact on community.(59–63 points)||Long and short term impact on community discussed, but evaluation method unclear.(53–58 points)||Presentation lacks clear evaluation method and future impact.(0–52 points)||/70|
|Summary20 points||Includes at least one summary slide that reiterates the problem and purpose of the presentation.(19–20 points)||Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem or purpose.(17–18 points)||Lacks reiteration of problem and purpose.(15–16 points)||Summary slide not present.(0–14 points)||/20|
|Overall presentation10 points||Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Bullet points with short phrases used instead of paragraphs. Font is easy to read.(9–10 points)||Presentation is clear and organized but lacks creativity or slides are too busy.(8 points)||Presentation is somewhat disorganized and lacks creativity.(7 points)||Presentation is disorganized and difficult to understand.(0–6 points)||/10|
|Mechanics15 points||Excellent mechanics with no more than two errors of the following:– complete title slide– correct grammar, spelling
– all sources cited in the text of slide
– all references listed on the reference slide and in APA format (hanging indent not needed for PowerPoint).
|Three mechanical errors of elements listed in column one.(13 points)||Four mechanical errors of elements listed in column one.(12 points)||More than five mechanical errors of elements listed in column one.(0–11 points)||/15|
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR443 Community Health Nursing NR443 Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation Methods 9/27/12 mm 1 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION METHODS For the final assignment in NR 443: Community Health Nursing, you will need to utilize a qualitative or quantitative evaluation method to evaluate your proposed intervention. Qualitative evaluation techniques generally are subjective data and can include methods such as: • observation methods • interviews • focus groups • other non-statistical data Example: If your proposed intervention is relatedto childhood obesity, you may want to interview the children pre and post intervention to see if their attitude about food and health has changed. This would be a qualitative evaluation method. Example: For the same intervention, you want to have a focus group with pre and post intervention with parents to see if their children’s attitudes about food have changed. This would be a qualitative evaluation method. Quantitative evaluation techniques generally are objective data and can include methods such as: • surveys/questionnaires • pre/posttests • physiologic data • statistical analysis Example: Your proposed intervention is the same as the example above, but instead of an interview, you would like to measure the children’s weight pre and post your intervention. This would be a quantitative evaluation method. Example: Another example of a quantitative evaluation method would be having a pre and posttest on healthy foods and importance of exercise. You would compare the pre intervention test results with the post to measure if your intervention was effective.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT